Documenting the Project Life-Cycle: Connecting ARMAP and AOV with ISO Metadata and RESTful Architectures for Data Sharing and Interoperability

Authors: John Kozimor, Ted Habermann, William Manley

Conference poster


Scientific communities commonly face challenges in sharing information during project life-cycles, from the proposal stage through data release.  Knowing who is doing what where can improve planning and coordination.  The same high-level project information can be linked to data collection sites and resulting datasets from a given project. Interoperability lessons learned from Arctic use cases are relevant to other scientific communities.  The Arctic Research Mapping Application (ARMAP) and the Arctic Observing Viewer (AOV) are examples of the benefits of collaboration. The underlying metadata workflow using the hierarchical ISO TC211 schema has been implemented for tracking projects, data collection sites and resulting datasets. ARMAP ( is a suite of online applications and services that provide project-tracking information for over 2600 projects funded by 17 different U.S. Agencies. The Arctic Observing Viewer ( compiles detailed information pertaining to over 7700 U.S. Arctic Observing efforts.  The databases have been developed and maintained by separate efforts, but they are now connected using RESTful web services that integrate collection site information into project searches using metadata standards. The next phase will add datasets collected at these sites into an integrated web-accessible knowledge base spanning the project life-cycle from planning through site selection and data collection to user discovery, use and understanding with interactive mapping and data services at all phases. This approach provides a unified framework for project managers and planners; scientists; data managers and archives; plus end-users to share information and streamline metadata management tasks across multiple teams with appropriate needs, expertise and experience.

Project Life Cycle

Many Arctic organizations are responsible for metadata creation and curation at different stages in the project life-cycle. The approach we are developing connects these stages with RESTful services and ISO metadata.

Figure 1: Poster - Documenting the Project Life Cycle.


Habermann, T., Kozimor, J., Barba, M., Cody, R., Dover, M., Escarzaga, S., Gaylord, A., Kassin, A.G., Manley, W.F., Score, R., Tweedie, C.E., and Villarreal, S.


This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Contract No. NSFDACS11C1675. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.


ADCN (Arctic Data Coordination Network). 2012. Minutes of the workshop of the Arctic Data Coordination Network: IPY 2012, 27 April, Montreal, Quebec. ADI Task Force. 2012. 

Designing, optimizing, and implementing an Arctic Observing Network (AON): A report by the AON Design and Implementation (ADI) Task Force. Fairbanks, Alaska: Study of Environmental Arctic Change. 64 p. 

ADIwg. 2011. Alaska Data Integration working group. 

ARCUS (Arctic Research Consortium of the United States). 2015. Study of Environmental Arctic Change: Observing change. 

Association of Research Libraries. 2006. To stand the test of time: Long-term stewardship of digital data sets in science and engineering. A report to the National Science Foundation from the ARL Workshop on “New Collaborative Relationships: The Role of Academic Libraries in the Digital Data Universe,” 26 –27 September 2006, Arlington, Virginia. 

BAID (Barrow Area Information Database). 2015. BAID: Preserving the legacy of research at Barrow. 

Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., and Lassila, O. 2001. The Semantic Web: Scientifc American 284.5:28 –37. Di, L., and Ramapriyan, H.K., eds. 2010. Standard-based data and information systems for earth observation. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. 248 p. 

Gaylord, A.G., Kassin, A., Manley, R. Cody, R., Dover, M., Escarzaga, S., Garcia, A., Score, R., and Tweedie, C.E. 2014. Arctic Research Mapping Application (ARMAP). Digital media. Englewood, Colorado: CH2M HILL Polar Services.

Johnson, G.W., Gaylord, A.G., Franco, J.C., Cody, R.P., Brady, J.J., Manley, W., Dover, M., Garcia-Lavigne, D., Score, R., and Tweedie, C.E. 2011. Development of the Arctic Research Mapping Application (ARMAP): Interoperability challenges and solutions. Computers & Geosciences 37(11):1735 –1742. 

Kling, R., and Scacchi, W. 1982. The web of computing: Computer technology as social organization. Irvine, California: Public Policy Research Organization, University of California. 90 p. 

Lee, O., Eicken, H., Kling, G., and Lee, C. 2015. A framework for prioritization, design and coordination of Arctic long-term observing networks: A perspective from the U.S. SEARCH Program. Arctic 68(Suppl. 1). 

Manley, W.F., Gaylord, A.G., Kassin, A., Villarreal, S., Cody, R., Dover, M., Escarzaga, S., et al. 2015. Arctic Observing Viewer (AOV). Digital media. Englewood, Colorado: CH2M HILL Polar Services. 

McCammon, M. 2013. Developing an Arctic Ocean observing system for Alaska: A conceptual design. White paper presented at Arctic Observing Summit, 29 April – 2 May 2013, Vancouver, British Columbia. 

Moore, J.A., McCammon, M., and Bochenek, R. 2013. Data management perspective for an international Arctic Observing Network: Preserving the legacy – Promoting exchange. White paper presented at Arctic Observing Summit, 29 April –2 May 2013, Vancouver, British Columbia. 

NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 2015. ISO components. Components 

NRC (National Research Council). 2006. Toward an integrated Arctic Observing network. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. 128 p. 

NSTC (National Science and Technology Council). 2013. Arctic Research Plan: FY2013 – 2017. Washington, D.C.: Executive Offce of the President, National Science and Technology Council. 104 p. ostp/2013_arctic_research_plan.pdf 

Parsons, M.A., de Bruin, T., Tomlinson, S., Campbell, H., Godoy, Ø., and LeClert, J. 2011. The state of Polar data: The IPY experience. In: Krupnik, I., Allison, A., Bell, R., Cutler, P., Hik, D., López-Martínez, J., Rachold, V., Sarukhanian, E., and Summerhayes, C., eds. Understanding Earth’s Polar challenges: International Polar Year 2007 –2008. Edmonton, Alberta: CCI Press. 457 – 476. 

Pulsifer, P.L., Yarmey, L., Godøy, Ø., Friddell, J., Vincent, W.F., DeBruin, T., and Parsons, M.A. 2013. Data management for Arctic Observing. White paper presented at Arctic Observing Summit, 29 April –2 May 2013, Vancouver, British Columbia. 

Pulsifer, P.L., Yarmey, L., Godøy, Ø., Friddell, J., Parsons, M., Vincent, W.F., DeBruin, T., et al. 2014. Towards an International Polar Data Coordination Network. Data Science Journal 13: PDA94 –PDA102. 

SAON (Sustaining Arctic Observing Networks). 2010. SAON Data Management Workshop Report: Developing a Strategic Approach, 7–8 June 2010, Oslo, Norway. 15 p. ———. 2011. Plan for the implementation phase of SAON. 16 p. Report%20February%202011.pdf 

Sorenson, M., Manley, W.F., Crain, R.D., and Warnick, W.K., eds. 2001. Recommendations for a geographic information infrastructure to support Arctic research: Outcomes of the Arctic GIS Workshop, 22 –24 January 2001, Seattle, Washington. Fairbanks: Arctic Research Consortium of the U.S. 49 p. 

White House. 2014. Implementation plan for the national strategy for the Arctic region. 32 p. implementation_plan_for_the_national_strategy_for_the_ arctic_region_-_f....pdf 

Yang, C., Raskin, R., Goodchild, M., and Gahegan, M. 2010. Geospatial cyberinfrastructure: Past, present and future. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 34:264 –277 

Yarmey, L., and Khalsa, S.J. 2014. Building on the International Polar Year: Discovering interdisciplinary data through federated search. Data Science Journal 13:PDA79 –PDA82